Legal Opinion

Smith v. Western Wayne County Conservation Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1968No. Calendar 20, Docket 51,482, 51,483PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

We adopt the following from the excellent opinion of the trial judge: *

“Plaintiffs’ bill of complaint seeks injunctive relief. The main question presented for determination is whether the use of the rifle and pistol ranges (hereinafter referred to as ‘range’) constructed on defendants’ property and located in section 19 of the northwest Plymouth township is a nuisance in fact and should he enjoined.
“Collateral to the questions of noise and safety of the range is the question of the use of defend ants’ clubhouse for weddings, parties, et cetera, involving the sale and consumption of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Robinson v. BaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Warren Township School District No. 7 v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Township of West Bloomfield v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Obrecht v. National Gypsum Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. DeNucci v. PezzaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Marshall v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Kolstad v. RankinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Racine v. Glendale Shooting Club, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API