Legal Opinion
Lakewood Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1982No. Civ. 53473PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MILLER, Acting P. J.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10, subdivision (c) petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the superior court to enter its order quashing service of summons on petitioner.
Petitioner Lakewood Bank and Trust Company is a Texas state bank which is named as a cross-defendant in a cross-complaint.
The Second Amended Complaint
According to the second amended complaint filed in this action some time prior to November 1978, defendant S. Bruce Smith and his sole proprietorship, defendant S.B.S. Investments, purchased an apartment complex in Dallas, Texas,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,567 Edmond G. Pharo v. W. L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- McFarland v. Memorex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,315 E. Elwood Lewis and James McDonald Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Walston & Co., Inc., Jackie DecasenaveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Mary B. Moran v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Luther v. Countrywide Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011