Legal Opinion

Buttura v. Buttura

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 7, 1983No. 520-81PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Pursuant to a judgment order of the Washington Superior Court, plaintiff was granted a divorce on the grounds that the parties had lived separate and apart for six consecutive months, with the resumption of marital relations not reasonably probable. 15 V.S.A. § 551 (7). Although defendant does not contest the issuance of the divorce, he does contest the trial court’s order directing him to pay plaintiff $15,000, in six installments of $2,500 each, “in full satisfaction of all claims for alimony, property settlement and suit money . . . .”

Since neither party has challenged the issuance of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quazzo v. QuazzoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  2. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  3. Andrew v. AndrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  4. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Field v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Mellin v. Flood Brook Union School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  3. Chaker v. ChakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Quesnel v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API