Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 6, 1980No. J77-2663, CA 14793PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant was found guilty of unlawfully obtaining public assistance and theft in the first degree. Judgment of conviction for theft was entered. A conviction for unlawfully obtaining public assistance was merged for purposes of sentencing. She now appeals, contending that her demurrer based upon the statute of limitations should have been sustained, that various exhibits were erroneously admitted into evidence, and that her motion for judgment of acquittal was erroneously denied.

The indictment had charged that defendant

"* * ^between May, 1974 through November, 1974, A.D.,* * *did unlawfully…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API