Voelker v. State

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Tamara Voelker appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after her guilty plea to one count of intentionally exploiting a vulnerable adult.1 She contests only *1099the restitution award of $43,821.30 to the gentleman whose resources she depleted, 89-year-old Wallace Reaves. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Voelker makes a single argument:

The district court erred when it held that the State had met its burden of proving the amount of restitution.

FACTS

[¶3] Upon finding that he was increasingly unable to care for himself, manage his finances, and pay his bills, Reaves initially welcomed…