Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Ingram.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ActioN by Christian. Smith against H. C. Ingram and others, heard by Judge A. L. Goble, at September Term, 1901, of the Superior Court-of MoNtgomeey County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.

1DissentClark, J.

On 21 January, 1878, the plaintiff was the owner of the land in controversy, lying and being in Montgomery County, North Carolina, containing 133 acres, which she agreed to sell to one Lindsay Hursey for $130. The plaintiff, Christian Smith, was at that time a married woman, being the wife of J. L. Smith, and has so remained the wife of said J. L. Smith until since (101) the commencement of this action; that in pursuance of said contract and agreement to sell, she and her said husband made and executed a deed sufficient in form to convey said land to said Hursey in fee simple, with a covenant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meroney v. Atlanta Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Scott v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Ruhe v. BuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Towles v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Armstrong, Cator & Co. v. BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Bundy v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Phillips v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Wiggins v. Pender.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Drake v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API