Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. Essence Communications, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1991No. 91 Civ. 2875 (CSH)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, District Judge:
Plaintiff brought this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, for a declaration of non-infringement of trademark, damages, and injunctive relief. Defendant counter-claimed for trademark infringement, damages, and injunctive relief. Subject matter jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338 and 1332. Venue lies under § 1391(b). The Court directed expedited discovery and advanced the action on the trial calendar. Rule 57, Fed.R.Civ.P. A bench trial on the merits commenced on June 24, 1991 and was concluded on July 2. What…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Schering Corporation v. Pfizer Inc. And Ucb Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Bayer AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Paco Sport, Ltd. v. Paco Rabanne ParfumsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Jack Co. of Boca, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.