Legal Opinion
United States v. Lo Bue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
The question presented is: What evidence is sufficient to lay the foundation for the admissibility of a telephone conversation where the witness is unable to recognize the caller’s or declarant’s voice as that of the defendant?
The defendants Louis LoBue and Frances LoBue (also known as Francesca Geni) are charged with violating the general conspiracy statute (U.S.C.A., Title 18, § 371) and the substantive provisions of U.S.C.A. Title 8, § 1324(a) (3, 4). Upon the trial of this indictment, the prosecution has called one Mrs. Lena Vicari as a witness.
Mrs. Vicari…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Riper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Jarvis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- State v. LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- United States v. Satiris G. FassoulisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Joe RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.