Legal Opinion

Lounden v. Bollam

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 11, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The plaintiff brought this suit to partition a certain tract of land in the city of St. Louis between herself and the defendant, alleging that they were joint tenants, each owning an undivided one-half interest in the property. Both parties claim, under the will of Mary Hazel Bollam, mother of the defendant, and grandmother of the plaintiff. The will of Mary Hazel Bollam has the following provisions affecting the property:

“Third: I give, bequeath and devise to my two sons, George P. Bollam and William F: Bollam, my house and lot, known as premises No. 3234 Lawton Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Downing v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Jamison v. HaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Rudolph v. RudolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Strong v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hoke v. HokeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Zombro v. MoffettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Snow v. FerrilSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Holloway v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Lawnick v. SchultzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API