Legal Opinion

Lawnick v. Schultz

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the partition of real estate situate in Gentry and DeKalb counties. The plaintiffs aver that they are heirs of their maternal grandfather, Frederick Schultz, pretermitted because they were not named or provided for in his will. The cause was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts and, from a judgment rendered by said court in favor of defendants, the plaintiffs appealed.

Omitting signatures and the description of the real property, the agreed statement of facts reads:

"The following facts are agreed to as being facts in this case: Frederick Schultz,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guitar v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. Hockensmith v. SlusherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  3. Estate of Cupples v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Jamison v. HaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. Rudolph v. RudolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frayssinous v. BrugnoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Reed v. ReedOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gibson Ex Rel. Doerner v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Barker v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Batley v. BatleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API