Bascomb v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Clara. Beldem, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. After the decision in Department, the appellant filed his petition that the appeal he reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
This action is brought to obtain a judgment that the defendant convey to the plaintiff a certain tract of land containing 29170°0 *153acres, which is known as lot No. 3 of section 11, T. 7, S. R, 1 W.
On the 15th of December, 1868, the plaintiff filed his declaratory pre-emption statement in the United States Land Office at San Francisco, in which he set forth, that, on the 24th day of May, 1850, he settled upon and improved a quarter-section of land which embraced said lot 3, and declared his intention to claim said quarter-section as a pre-emptive right. He has obtained a patent…
2Cited by6 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re CateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Francis v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.