Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1912No. 4053PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; ■Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the State against C. E. Jones and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a suit commenced by the county attorney of Muskogee county for the purpose of enjoining the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, from conducting a turf exchange, upon the ground that conducting such an, enterprise constitutes a common nuisance, which may be enjoined under section 5771, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 4881), which reads in part:

«* * =:= An injunction may be granted in the name of the state to enjoin and. suppress the keeping and maintaining of a common nuisance.”

Upon the trial, the court below issued a permanent injunction, to reverse which this proceeding in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ex Parte AllisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. West v. State Capital Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Cowie v. La Crosse Theaters Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Town of Rush Springs v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Valdez v. State Ex Rel. FarriorSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API