Legal Opinion

Friddle v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1932No. Docket No. 4396PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, from a judgment entered against it upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $25,500. The plaintiffs are two minor children and the widow of Glen Friddle, who was killed on the twenty-first day of March, 1929, by reason of a collision between an autotruck, which said Glen Friddle, as the sole occupant, was driving, and a passenger train of the appellant. The case was dismissed as to all defendants save appellant Southern Pacific Company. A motion for a new trial was made and denied.

The facts necessary for a correct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Sheets v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thornton v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lahey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Downing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Heintz v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Mardesich v. C. J. Hendry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API