Legal Opinion

Laurence L. Lambert v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1989No. 88-3432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action challenging a determination by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) that certain funds on deposit at two failed thrift institutions were not insured. The district court granted summary judgment for FSLIC. We affirm.

I

In 1986, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) appointed the FSLIC as receiver for Audubon Federal Savings and Loan Association (Audubon) and Crescent Federal Savings Bank (Crescent). Both failed thrifts were located in Louisiana and were federally chartered and insured. The FHLBB directed the FSLIC in its corporate capacity to make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. North Mississippi Savings & Loan Association and New North Mississippi Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Joseph M. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Godwin v. Federal Savings and Loan Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jorge Vergara Madrigal v. Angelica TellezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Hymel, Clu v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Coy U. Spawn, Jr. v. Western Bank-Westheimer and Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
  5. Hymel v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API