Legal Opinion
Federal Nat. Bank v. Sartin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 30, 1926No. 15582PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and the defendants in error were defendants in the trial court, and the parties will be referred to herein as they there appeared.
The defendants were engaged in the automobile and garage business, and in tbe tbe course of such business had indorsed with recourse a large number of notes to the Security State .Bank of Shawnee. Thereafter, the defendants executed and delivered their note for $8,'325.6l to said bank, which was secured by mortgag;. Sometime after that, the Security State Bank of Shawnee failed and was taken over by the State Banking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McCants v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Simpson v. MauldinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- First Nat. Bank of Taloga v. Farmers' State Guaranty Bank of ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bredouw v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- M.-K.-T. R. Co. v. EmbreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Patteson v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Adams v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Ruby v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.