Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Vallone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*730The defendant did not make a clear showing that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, was not legally sufficient to establish that the driver of the blue truck in question was the shooter and that the defendant was the driver of the blue truck (see, People v Adorno, 112 AD2d 308). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, in a wholly circumstantial case the evidence before the Grand Jury need not exclude to a moral certainty every hypothesis consistent with innocence (People v Deegan, 69 NY2d 976; People v Jennings, 69 NY2d 103). Thus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. HeizmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. AdornoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WootenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. TomainoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. OlivoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API