Legal Opinion

Vratis v. Wilbanks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 3, 1926No. 11617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was brought by Mabel Jeanette Wilbanks, joined pro forma by her husband, J. F. Wilbanks, against Nick Vratis and his wife, Christina Vratis, and John Kastoleas, to cancel a deed conveying a one-half interest in a lot situated in Fort Worth, Tex., executed by Peter Chokas and his wife, Mabel Jeanette Chokas, on the 5th day of June, 1916.

The pleadings and evidence show without dispute that Nick Vratis owned the lot in controversy, and on November 13, 1914, conveyed an undivided one-half interest therein to Peter Chokas. On April 29, 1916, the plaintiff Mabel Jeanette and Peter Chokas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hughes v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Scarborough v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Harcrow v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API