Scarborough v. Blount
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Jasper County; W. B. Powell, Judge. Suit for partition' by certain heirs of Alfred Blount against others of such heirs, and P. E. Scarborough intervened. From the judgment, the intervener appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
This is a suit for partition instituted by some of the heirs of Alfred Blount against others of such heirs. The land sought to be divided consisted of two tracts of land adjoining, and containing in the aggregate 242% acres. P. E. Scarborough intervened, claiming that he was the owner by purchase and conveyance from William Blount, one of the heirs, of his interest as such heir, and that he was also the owner of an undivided 42% a'cres of said land which had been conveyed by Alfred Blount to William Blount in his lifetime, and which had been conveyed by William Blount to him. M. E. McFarlane…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Rivera v. White, GuardianTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Eastham v. RoundtreeTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Hoeser v. KraekaTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Dittman v. Weiss Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hughes v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Letcher v. LetcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- O'Loughlin v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.