Legal Opinion
Ransom v. Arkansas, State of
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided January 7, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00217Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STANLEY V. RANSOM, III PLAINTIFF No. 3:21-cv-217-DPM STATE OF ARKANSAS; CHARLES E. CLAWSON, Judge; COURTNEY KENNEDY, Prosecutor; PRESTON JONES, ADC Probation/Parole Officer; and COURTNEY CATO, Prosecutor DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. Ransom’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is granted. He reports no income, no employment, and two dependents. 2. The Court must screen Ransom’s complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Ransom pleaded guilty in 2012 to a number of state crimes and was sentenced to eighty-four…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Henry Hamilton v. City of Hayti, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- David Sample v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- James A. Duty Opal Duty v. City of Springdale, Arkansas Stanley Ludwig, Individually and in His Capacity as Municipal Judge of Springdale, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Dr. Earl Evans v. W.H. "Sonny" Dillahunty and William E. Amos, in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.