Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, C. J.

On the hearing, the sufficiency of the title offered was properly made to depend upon whether deed from Mary A. Laughing-house to T. L. Laughinghouse for the locus in quo conveys a fee simple or only a life estate.

The habendum is “to him, the said party of the second part, for and during the term of his natural life,” and at his death “said lands shall descend to his heirs at law or to such collateral relations as may he entitled to same upon failure of issue.” We agree with the trial court that by virtue of the operation of the rule in Shelley’s case, which obtains in this jurisdiction, not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nobles v. . NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Merchants National Bank v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Welch v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Martin v. . KnowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Morehead v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. . FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Riegel v. LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Chappell v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Rose v. . RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API