Legal Opinion
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 2, 2003No. CV 01-08541-SVW (PJWx), CV 01-09923-SVW (PJWx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
WILSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On January 9, 2003, this Court denied a motion by Defendant Sharman Networks, Ltd. (“Sharman”) to dismiss for, among other reasons, lack of personal jurisdiction. On February 18, 2003, Sharman filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaims (“FAAC”). Sharman brings three federal counterclaims against Plaintiffs 1 : (1) “re fusal to deal” in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act; (2) “conspiracy to monopolize” in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act; and (3) declaratory relief as to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lorenzo v. Qualcomm Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2009
- In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Amaretto Ranch Breedables, LLC v. Ozimals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. RMG Technologies, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Adobe Systems Inc. v. KornrumpfDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.