Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hogan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 9, 1983PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The plaintiff, an inmate with protective custody status at the Southeastern Correctional Center at Bridge-water (S.E.C.C.), brought an action, pro se, pursuant to G. L. c. 12, § 111, alleging violations of his civil rights by the defendants, all of whom were employees of the Department of Correction (department). Specifically, the plaintiff cited the refusal to grant him a transfer to the “cadre unit” at S.E.C.C; the failure to allow him the opportunity to hold an inmate job and thereby obtain compensation and “good time” credit; the confiscation of certain items of personal property; the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. James E. Sweet v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Director William D. LeekeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Shabazz v. ColeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  3. Champagne v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Shaheed-Muhammad v. DipaoloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  5. Haverty v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API