Legal Opinion
Cesnik v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 6, 1980No. 77-3313PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
In 1976 the defendants Chrysler Corpora-, tion and Fedders Corporation entered into a contract whereby Chrysler would sell the assets of its Airtemp Division to Fedders. After the sale, Airtemp Division became Airtemp Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fedders, and the third named defendant in this action. 1 The plaintiffs maintain that, as part of this transaction, Chrysler and Fedders also agreed that Chrysler would not rehire any of its former Airtemp managerial employees who refused employment by Fedders. As former Air-temp managers who refused…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Winfree v. Educators Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- AM International, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority (In Re AM International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.