McCreless v. State

Appéllánt was convicted of the offense of illegally being in possession of prohibited liquor, to wit, “home-brew,” which contained alcohol.

He was tried before the court, sitting without a jury, and this appeal is under the’ provisions of Code 1923, §§ 8599, 9502.

We will review' the conclusions of fact reached by the judge trying the case — the evidence being given orally before him — on the same basis (i. e., in the same way) that the verdict of a jury will be reviewed, when a motion is made (and overruled, and the case brought here by appeal) to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the…