Legal Opinion

Latendresse v. Latendresse

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1979No. Civ. 9583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Justice.

Orville Latendresse and Ruth Laten-dresse [“Orville and Ruth”], defendants and appellants, have appealed to this court from a summary judgment of the McHenry County District Court. The plaintiff and appellee, Albert Latendresse [“Albert”], has moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 31(c) of the North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure because of Orville and Ruth’s failure to file their brief within the time prescribed by Rule 31(c); and pursuant to Rule 7, N.D.R.App.P., on the ground that Orville and Ruth failed to secure a cost bond or a supersedeas bond.

Albert…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tower City Grain Co. v. RichmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Gerhardt v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re Guardianship of FrankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. LoefflerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. PackineauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Latendresse v. LatendresseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Meier v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. MacDonald v. North Dakota Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dossenko v. DossenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API