Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Neill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 12519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANSON. J.

This action is in replevin. The plaintiff. J. O. Neill, prevailed in the district court of Garvin county as against the defendants J. H. Holmes and I. C. Van Bibber. The losing defendants are the plaintiffs in error, and the prevailing plaintiff is the defendant in error. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

The plaintiff sought by the replevin action to recover from the defendants approximately 3,000 broom corn slats, of the alleged value of $300, on the ground that' he was the owner thereof, and entitled to the immediate possession at the time of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Etchen v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Western National Bank v. GersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Tolle v. VandenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. Bass Furn. & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Wyman v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API