Legal Opinion
United States v. Christopher Patrick Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 20, 2014No. 12-13647PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
Two changes in law — a statutory change and a decisional change — require us to reconsider whether the admission of a certification of the Secretary of State to establish extraterritorial jurisdiction for a prosecution of drug trafficking on the high seas violates a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him at trial. U.S. Const. Amend. VI. In United States v. Rojas, we held that the admission at trial of a certification to establish jurisdiction over a Panamanian vessel laden with cocaine and seized on the high seas did not violate the Confrontation Clause…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States v. Quartavious DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Carlington CruickshankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Andre Michael DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Trinity Rolando Cabezas-MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Henry Vazquez ValoisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.