Omar Portugués-Santana v. Rekomdiv International Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Twice now this case, arising out of a district court judgment against Rekomdiv International, Inc. (“Rekomdiv”) and Richard Domingo (“Domingo”), comes before us. The jury had found Rekomdiv and Domingo liable for “dolo en contrahendo” under Puerto Rico law and awarded the plaintiff, Víctor Omar Portugués-Santana (“Portugués”), $625,000 in damages. Our prior decision in this case, Portugués-Santana v. Rekomdiv Int’l Inc., 657 F.3d 56 (1st Cir.2011), remanded to the district court the issue of whether offset of the damages award was required. On remand, the district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Gonzalez GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Perez Acevedo v. Rivero CubanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Colón Prieto v. GéigelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- A.G. Ex Rel. Maddox v. Elsevier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Vargas-Colon v. Fundacion Damas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Norris v. Cape Elizabeth School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.