Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lipka

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 2018No. A159657Published

1DissentGarrett, J.

In concluding that the evidence of defendant's use of the word "nigger" was admissible notwithstanding *836OEC 403, the majority holds that the trial court could permissibly determine that, under the circumstances here, the probative value of that evidence was not "substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." OEC 403. I respectfully disagree.

Evidence is unfairly prejudicial when it has "an undue tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis, commonly, although not always, an emotional one." State v. Lyons , 324 Or. 256, 280, 924 P.2d 802 (1996). We have held that such an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. LyonsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. ZimmerleeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bray v. American Property Management Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API