Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Although section 261 of the Civil Practice Act permits a defendant to set forth in his answer counterclaims as well as denials and defenses, section 272 of the Civil Practice Act permits a plaintiff to include in a reply only denials and defenses. Matter in recoupment or setoff must be pleaded as a counterclaim and not as a defense. (Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co., 195 N. Y. 324, 332-334; Merry Realty Co., Inc., v. S. & H. R. E. Co., 186 App. Div. 538, 542, 543; revd. on other grounds, 230 N. Y. 316.) It follows that the allegations of the reply to which the present motion is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Young v. DresserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pekofsky v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Paretta v. White Acres Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Phillips v. Manufacturers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Seligmann v. MandelNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API