Legal Opinion
Pekofsky v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided December 11, 1958No. Claims Nos. 34060, 34203, 34589PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.
On several occasions during the trial of these claims, objections were made by the Attorney-General and by the attorney for the landlord, Thelma Pekofsky, as to the admission of testimony under the leases of claimants Henry J. McCall and Louis Good. At the end of claimants’ case and at the end of the trial, motions were made to dismiss the claims of Henry J. McCall and Louis Good. Decision thereon was reserved.
A clause in the McCall lease reads as follows: “In the event leased premises or any part thereof are taken by condemnation *359or any government authority, the lessors shall not be liable…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seibert v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In Re the Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn Bridge to Acquire Lands of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Richard Deeves & Son v. Manhattan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Clarkson v. . SkidmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Airport Lodge of Rochester, Inc. v. Brooks-Buell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Firemen's Insurance v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Zara Contracting Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
- Airport Lodge of Rochester, Inc. v. Brooks-Buell, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Arlen of Nanuet v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.