Legal Opinion

Smith v. Iola Portland Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1912No. 17,390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was- delivered by

Porter, J.:

Action for damages for personal injuries. The negligence alleged was the failure of the defendant to comply with the provisions of the factory *288act by properly safeguarding a certain gearing attached to a line shaft, by reason of which the plaintiff was injured. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The court rendered judgment thereon and the defendant appeals.

The complaints respecting the instructions are not well taken. The instruction refused was fully covered by instructions six and seven, which the court gave. The instructions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winter v. SassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. State v. YordiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. State v. ComstockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. Alkire v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Miller v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. Briley v. NussbaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Collins v. City Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Ohlson v. Central Kansas Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API