Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Bullock

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 17, 1950No. 16287PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This litigation involves the interpretation of the statutes relating to the remuneration of a county judge of a county of the fourth class when he also acts as clerk of the court. It arose when the County Commissioners sought an accounting from the County Judge. After defendant had answered, plaintiff filed a motion to amend the complaint. This was denied. But the court then ordered the parties to enter into an agreed statement of facts, which they did subsequently. This statement reads as follows:

“The parties, by their respective attorneys, hereby agree to the facts in this case, as follows:
“…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Airy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Dixon v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Cascade Ice Co. v. Austin Bluff Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Flanders v. KochenbergerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. W. Houston Construction Co. v. District Court of the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Fladung v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Van Dreal v. Van DrealCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API