Legal Opinion

Wiglesworth v. Wyrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 1976No. 59208Published

1Opinion of the Court

531 S.W.2d 713 (1976)

Lyman Eugene WIGLESWORTH, Petitioner,

v.

Donald WYRICK, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. 59208.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

January 12, 1976.

John E. Downs, St. Joseph, for petitioner.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen. (Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen.), Jefferson City, for respondent.

FINCH, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. We quash the writ heretofore issued for the reason that the relief to which petitioner claims to be entitled is required by Rule 27.26[1] to be sought by a motion filed in accordance with the provisions of that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Francis T. Glynn v. Robert Donnelly, John M. Farrell v. Robert DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  5. James William Smith v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API