Legal Opinion

Beaumont S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1932No. 2614PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries. At the time of the happening of the circumstances involved here, appellee was in the employ of appellant railway company as telegraph operator and clerk at Huffman, Tex., a station on appellant’s line of railroad. At Huffman appellant maintained a nearby well and water tank, used for supplying its trains with water. The water was pumped into the water tank from the well by means of a kerosene or oil burning engine. At the time appellee received his injuries complained of in this suit, he was operating the water engine pump, as was one of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Butler v. FrazeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. SwearingenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Houston North Shore Railway Co. v. TyrrellTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Beaumont, Sour Lake & Western Railway Co. v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Beaumont, S. L. & W. Ry. Co. v. SchmidtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  4. Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ClairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API