State v. Yee Foo Lun
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. G. W. Morse, Judge. Yee Foo Lun was convicted of practicing medicine without a license. He appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of practicing medicine without. a license, and appeals. • The statute (Laws of 1911, p. 135) under which he was prosecuted, so far as material defines the practice of medicine thus:
/‘Any person shall be regarded as practicing medicine within the meaning of this title, who shall diagnose, treat, operate upon, or prescribe or advise for, any physical or mental ailment or any abnormal,' mental or physical condition of another” for a “fee, gift, compensation or other pecuniary benefit, reward or consideration; * *' * Provided that nothing in this title shall be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Lewis v. BrannenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- People v. FisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HoffmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Board of Medical Examiners v. FreenorUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. TerrillUtah Supreme Court · 1916