Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Dalluge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2004No. 73608-1PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

At the age of 17, Amel Dalluge was tried and convicted as an adult of two counts of rape in the third degree, and these convictions were upheld on appeal. In a personal restraint petition, Dalluge now contends that either his convictions should be reversed because he was improperly tried as an adult, or his case should be remanded to superior court for a hearing on whether the juvenile court should have retained jurisdiction. Dalluge also asserts that both his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to object to improper adult criminal court jurisdiction at trial and on…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CraceWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API