Michael Rogers, et al. v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Michael Rogers, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00867-CDS-BNW 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend. ECF No. 106.1 Defendants opposed at 11 ECF No. 109, and Plaintiffs replied, and supplemented their reply, at ECF Nos. 114 and 116. 12 Because Plaintiffs have shown good cause and excusable neglect to amend, and because 13 Defendants failed to show that amendment should be denied, this Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion. 14 The parties are familiar…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.