Legal Opinion

Cabiness v. Bureau Of Prisons

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 2, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00003Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division TYRONE CABINESS, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:23CV3 (RCY) BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Tyrone Cabiness, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed this petition for habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(hereinafter “§ 2241 Petition,” ECF No. 2.) Cabiness contends that he is entitled to relief on the following grounds:1 Claim One: “Federal authorities obtained primary jurisdiction upon Petitioner (Cabiness), because of this, federal authorities should credit the Petitioner…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Kevin L. Barden v. Patrick Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API