Rotter v. Rotter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The judgment of divorce provided, in paragraph 10:
“. . . that the defendant [husband] shall cooperate in the conversion of health insurance coverage for the plaintiff [wife] ; . . .”
At the time of the divorce, the wife (hereinafter plaintiff), was insured by a group insurance policy held by the husband (hereinafter defendant). Divorce terminated the plaintiff’s coverage under the policy, effective May 1, 1973. However, if the insurer had learned of the divorce within fifty-five days, (that is, prior to May 31, 1973) the wife would have been offered an opportunity to convert her coverage under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foregger v. ForeggerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Thies v. MacDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Courtney v. CourtneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Gallagher v. ScherneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Chandler v. ChandlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wright v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- In RE MARRIAGE OF WASHINGTON v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Wright v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Wright v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979