Legal Opinion
United States v. Finazzo
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 18, 1977No. Crim. 5-80597PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEITH, Chief Judge.
Defendants Finazzo and Licavoli have moved this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(10)(a) (1970) for an Order suppressing all evidence obtained by the government from the electronic interception of oral communications on the premises of AAA Store Fixtures, Inc. at 8624 Medbury, Detroit, Michigan. The court, having allowed briefs in support of and in opposition to these motions, is of the opinion that this matter should be handled without an oral hearing, pursuant to Rule IX(j) of the Local Court Rules.
The instant motions relate to electronic…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Ross AgrusaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MotteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Gustafson v. Fred Wolferman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ScafidiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Fitzgerald v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- In Re GwinnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Kirsch Co. v. Bliss & Laughlin Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- United States v. Lawrence DaliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.