Legal Opinion
Borough of Big Run v. Shaw
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 260 and 261 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
This is another appeal where the litigants do not differ on the applicable law but only on its application to the factual situation which produced the dispute.
The Borough of Big Run decided to open a new street and filed declarations of taking pursuant to the provisions *625of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, P. L. 84, as amended, 26 P.S. §1 — 101 et seq. The land condemned was to be transformed into a one-way street with a width varying between 10 feet and 12 feet and a length of approximately 451.5 feet, running parallel with Main Street and connecting Water…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Price v. Philadelphia Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Philadelphia Clay Co. v. York Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Redevelopment Authority of City of Erie v. Owners or Parties in InterestCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Adelphia Cablevision Associates of Radnor, L.P. v. University City Housing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Borough of Duncansville v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- A & L Investments v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.