State v. Loftin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
Defendant’s counsel, who represented him in the trial court and upon this appeal, have filed a motion requesting permission to withdraw as counsel. The motion was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). It is based upon counsel’s conclusion “that any appeal would be frivolous and without merit.” Counsel filed a brief in which they set forth three matters “that might arguably support the appeal.”
Defendant was timely furnished with a copy of the motion and brief and informed that he had the right to submit a brief pro se in this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. ColotisWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HyattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. HanniganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State v. KoserWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970