In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, Indiana on October 31, 1994
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion requesting a ruling as to the substantive law applicable to the issue of compensatory damages is presently before the Court in these consolidated actions arising out of the tragic and fatal crash of American Eagle Flight 4184 near Roselawn Indiana on October 31, 1994. Specifically, the Airline and ATR defendants 1 (collectively “defendants”) seek a determination that Indiana law governs the issue of compensatory damages in six cases involving Indiana decedents. 2 In response to defendants’ motion, plaintiffs argue that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Beynon v. Montgomery Cablevision Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- A.O.A. v. RennertDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.