Legal Opinion

In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, Indiana on October 31, 1994

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 6, 1996No. 95 C 4593. MDL No. 1070PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CASTILLO, District Judge.

Defendants’ motion requesting a ruling as to the substantive law applicable to the issue of compensatory damages is presently before the Court in these consolidated actions arising out of the tragic and fatal crash of American Eagle Flight 4184 near Roselawn Indiana on October 31, 1994. Specifically, the Airline and ATR defendants 1 (collectively “defendants”) seek a determination that Indiana law governs the issue of compensatory damages in six cases involving Indiana decedents. 2 In response to defendants’ motion, plaintiffs argue that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Simon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. Beynon v. Montgomery Cablevision Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. A.O.A. v. RennertDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API