Legal Opinion

Vega v. Chicago Park District

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 2, 2016No. 13 C 451PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

James B. Zagel, United States District Judge

In this action, Plaintiff Lydia E. Vega (“Plaintiff’) alleges that her former employer, Defendant Chicago Park District (“Defendant” or the “Park”), unlawfully discriminated against her in violation of both 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Plaintiff also brings two privacy-based pendant state claims against Defendant. This case is presently before me on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all counts. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vega v. Chi. Park Dist.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Karpen v. McDonoughDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  3. Vega v. Chicago Park DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  4. Vega v. Chicago Park DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API