Berenson v. Town of New Castle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gulotta, J.
The plaintiffs have secured a declaratory judgment invalidating the zoning ordinance of the Town of New Castle to the extent that it fails to make adequate provision for multifamily housing. (At the time this action was commenced, the ordinance totally excluded multifamily residential housing from the list of permitted uses. A subsequent amendment, examined in proposal form at the trial and enacted prior to Special Term’s decision, purports to provide for 100 to 150 *508units of multifamily housing, as a permitted use, in the central business district of Chappaqua.)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Blitz v. Town of New CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Allen v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Asian American for Equality v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Land Master Montg I, LLC v. Town of MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.