Legal Opinion
Pope v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 23, 1996No. CR-94-1636Published
1Opinion of the Court
On Return to Remand
McMILLAN, Judge.
This cause was remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter an order stating with particularity the court’s reasons for denying William Pope’s Rule 32, Ala. R.Cr.P., 682 So.2d 486 (Ala.Crim.App.1996).
The trial court, in compliance with this court’s instruction, issued the following order:
“There were two issues raised by the defendant at his Rule 32 hearing:
“(1) Denial of effective assistance of counsel.
“A. Failed to object to charge on reasonable doubt.
“B. Failed to object to submission of three prior felonies by the State at sentencing hearing.
“(2)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996