Legal Opinion
Aldeman v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Tulsa Port Warehouse Co.)
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 28, 1980No. Bankruptcy 79-C-354-BTPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRETT, District Judge.
Defendants-Appellants, General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC) and Chuck Naiman Buick Company (Naiman), appeal to this Court for reversal of judgment entered by the Bankruptcy Court on March 13, 1979. That judgment and the accompanying Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law held that leases involving four automobiles were as a matter of law leases intended for security and thus subject to the perfection requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code. It was further held that since these security agreements had not been perfected as required by the U.C.C., the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donald L. Bone v. Hibernia Bank and Michael ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- In the Matter of Spencer Jerome Tillery, Bankrupt. Bill Swad Leasing Company v. Henry A. Stikes, Sr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Citicorp Leasing, Inc. v. Allied Institutional Distributors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Crest Investment Trust, Inc. v. Atlantic Mobile Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coble Systems, Inc. v. Coors of the Cumberland, Inc. (In Re Coors of the Cumberland, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
- In Re Loop Hospital PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- In Re PeacockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- In Re TuckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
- In Re Grubbs Construction Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.