Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Klincar

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 16, 1983No. 82 C 7036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.

Before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss petitioner Johnson’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is granted, without prejudice, and with leave to reinstate once petitioner has exhausted his state remedies by seeking a writ of mandamus in the state courts.

Johnson seeks habeas relief on the grounds that the denial of his parole violated the ex post facto clause, due process, and equal protection. The state has moved to dismiss on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Duckworth v. SerranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People Ex Rel. Abner v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Leon Johnson v. Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. McGinnisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. United States ex rel. Brown v. McGinnisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API