Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Arkansas Valley Coal Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1982No. 81-189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The question presented is whether machinery used by the appellee, Arkansas Valley Coal Services, Inc., to crush and blend coal qualifies for an exemption allowed by Arkansas’s compensating (or use) tax law. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-3106 (D) (2) (Repl. 1980). The statute exempts equipment or machinery directly used in manufacturing and specifies mining as a type of manufacturing. Arkansas Valley paid a use tax of $2,383.14 under protest. The trial court held that Arkansas Valley was an integral part of the coal mining industry within the meaning of the statute and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Scurlock v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. S. H. & J. Drilling Corp. v. QuallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Gaddy v. Hummelstein Iron & Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walther v. Carrothers Construction Co. of Arkansas, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Walther v. Carrothers Construction Co. of Arkansas, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Walther v. Carrothers Construction Co. of Arkansas, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API